Entries in commentary (3)

Friday
Mar142008

Bravo to Bill Gates

A few weeks ago Bill Gates joined Linked[in]. It is often the network’s practice when a high profile member joins, to invite them to post a “featured question” on the site’s Q&A page. Mr. Gates did so by asking:

How can we do more to encourage young people to pursue careers in science and technology?

Before the question was closed, it received 3567 answers. Unfortunately, Bill did not mark a best answer (or even a list of good answers). My reply, which appears here (the 18th answer on page 90), emphasized that meeting our job market demand for scientist and engineers could not be met with education alone, but only by also opening up citizenship to foreign born students receiving college degrees in American Universities. My reply began:

With only 5% of the world’s population, all our talent cannot be homegrown. We desperately need to open our doors to more (I’d say “unlimited”) H-1B visas. With a shortage of engineering and scientific degrees going to American students, our Universities give more technical degrees to foreign students than domestic… yet when their student visas expire we effectively throw them out of our country. A great many of them want to stay here, and yet after giving them our most precious intellectual property, we basically give them the boot. We should be passing out citizenship at graduation ceremonies. Foreign students who earn a degree at a U.S. University in a field where America has a shortage of talent should be granted immediate and automatic citizenship. Anything less is both foolish and shameful. —bold emphasis added.



On March 12th, Bill Gates gave an address before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science and Technology, on the topic of Competitiveness and Innovation. This address marked the committee’s 50th Anniversary.

Bill Gates’ address to Congress:



Most of the committee members were respectful and receptive to Mr. Gates’ message. Representative Ralph Hall of Texas, district 4 gave a particularly warm introductory speech. There was one quite noteworthy exception. Dana Rohrabacher, California representative, district 46, who went on a protectionist/isolationist rant, felt that if Microsoft couldn’t hire the “A students” from abroad, they should just hire “B and C students” that were American born. He felt it was Microsoft’s responsibility to create jobs for these workers too. He even made the argument that, by giving H-1B visas to foreign engineers, that we would unfairly damage the labor needs of the recipient’s home country (you can’t make this stuff up!). After this bone-head (can I say that? …yes, of course I can. It’s my blog.) went beyond his alloted time, the chair of the committee asked him to wrap it up. Incensed by the perceived insult, Mr. Rohrabacher blathered, “You know, I’ve got a, uh, I’m working at, uh, I’m one of the guys who helped Kosovo become independent, I’m on the Foreign Relations Committee…” before he was eventually shut up. California, is this guy really the best you can find to represent you?

There is a very foolish and shortsighted sentiment that H-1B visas drive down wages and/or cause US citizens to loose jobs to foreign workers. With a shortage of scientific and engineering candidates, without more (many more) H-1B visa recipients, these jobs do not then go to natural born American citizens, but rather simply go unfilled. And that highly sought candidate will instead be employed by a foreign competitor.

Bill’s address was succinct but not thin, and his follow-up answers were well informed. He covered everything from the role of philanthropy in improving education, new educational opportunities offered by the internet, US competitiveness as compared to Europe and Asia, US investment in research and development, his strong support for the America Competes Act, teaching programs that have been successful both inside and outside the US, and what effect this has had on American competitiveness and businesses ability to meet their hiring needs. It was however, the issue of H-1B visas that captured the media. Below I have pulled all of Bill’s quotes related to the subject from the more than 2 hours of footage, sans any media spin (only 9 minutes of which was his actual Congressional address).

At time marker 5:25, citing research (PDF) Mr. Gates makes the case that H-1B visas actually create more jobs here in the United States:

Today our university computer science and engineering programs include large numbers of foreign students. In fact, the Science and Engineering Indicators Report showed that 59 percent of doctoral degrees and 43 percent of all higher-ed degrees in engineering and computer science are awarded to temporary residence. But our current immigration policies make it increasingly difficult for these students to remain in the United States. At the time when talent is the key to economic success, it makes no sense to educate people in our Universities, often subsidized by US tax payers and then insist that they return home. US innovation has always been based in part on the contributions of foreign born scientist and researchers. For example, a recent survey, uh, conducted by several universities, showed that between 1999 and 2005, firms with at least one foreign born founder created 450,000 new US jobs. Moreover, as a recent study shows– for every H-1B holder that technology companies hire, five additional jobs are created around that person. But as you know our immigration system makes it very difficult for US firms to hire highly skilled foreign workers.

At time marker 7:51 he added:

I want to emphasize that, to address the shortage of scientist and engineers, we must do both– reform our education system and our immigration policies.

While the video above only contains Bill Gates’ address, and not the follow-up questions by members of the house which, as I point out, lasted much longer than the address itself, I have included a couple of noteworthy highlights. The majority of the committee’s members were sympathetic to Mr. Gates position, Mr. Rohrabacher bizarre comments above being the only exception.

Later, in response to a question by Mr. Rothman, representative for New Jersey, district 9, at time marker 10:47, Mr. Gates further made the point:

I’d also suggest that, if someone’s educated in a US University that, because of the research funding that comes out of the government, you know, you’ve basically subsidized that education, I think there should be a direct path to permanent residency.

In another exchange with the committee regarding the stature of American Universities, Mr. Gates has this to add (11:04):

The very top engineers, the US Universities still have a strong position, but as I’ve said, the majority of the students in the computer science department are foreign born. And so we educate them. We provide the world’s very best education, and the… the research funding and various things are, a… a major factor there. And then those are the students who, uh, are not allowed to stay and, and work in the country because of the limits we have.

I would like to commend Bill Gates for speaking sense in the face of all the ill-founded isolationism being advocated by some false populist shills for the labor union special interests. The tech sector is the future of the American economy, and of the world. If America is to continue to prosper, we must increase our number of scientist, engineers and mathematicians. Even if all American college graduates became engineers, we would still have a shortage. This has more to do with birthrates than anything else. The only way to close this gap is through immigration, and the low hanging fruit are those foreigners who have already been educated in our system. They are already here, they want to stay here, and when we force them to leave, they will not leave the labor market, they will simply goto work in a foreign competitor economy, taking American intellectual capital with them as we throw them out.

I started off writing a technology story, and here I am, stuck in politics again.



RELATED LINKS:

Bill Gates’ Address in the C-Span Archives
Bill Gates’ full hearing before the Committee on Science and Technology, including pre-address comments by committee members, as well as a post address question and answer with Bill Gates, can be viewed in full at C-Span’s online archives. Available formats include both a Flash Movie and a Windows Media file (total run time is just over two hours). It can also be ordered on DVD.

Committee on Science and Technology, 50th Anniversary Address
Additionally, the address can be viewed in full from the United States House of Representatives’ website as a Real Media file.

Bill Gates unabridged written testimony as PDF
Due to time constraints, Mr. Gates agreed to give an abridged version of his address. His full testimony was entered into the record in writing, and can be downloaded in PDF form.

Microsoft website— Bill Gates, transcript from committee address
The full transcript of Bill Gates address before the Congressional committee, including all follow-up questions.

Bill Gates’ Speeches— Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Transcripts of other speeches by Bill Gates, in the archives of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Saturday
Feb102007

Constructivist Design Books



Oh serendipity. I was looking through a box of leave-behinds and takeaways— the miscellaneous detritus of functions invited or attended, looking for the handbill from a 1990s Miami Beach arcade. I never found it. But I did come across a more recent stack of exhibition pamphlets, including the one shown above from the 2002 MoMA exhibit of Constructivist book cover designs: The Russian Avant-Garde Book | 1910-1934.

In my usual stream of conscious, it made me think of a book that I’ve been watching for some time on eBay- debating a purchase. There is a bookseller in Moscow named yellowcaptain. He has many fabulous books on Soviet era art and design. I don’t know his relationship with the publisher, but he sells the same list of titles over and over. This one is on book cover design:


Borr: Book Cover Design of Bor-Ramensky

Excerpt from the description: The book tells the story of quite forgotten extraordinary self-taught designer, Konstantin Georgievich Bor-Ramemsky. His truncated signature, Borr (or BorR), has gone down as a kind of pseudonym. He was born at the turn of the century and died in action in 1943. He worked as graphic designer, stage designer, interior designer and worker’s club decorator in Siberia, Georgia and Moscow. In the Western and Russian literature, only one of his works is referred to, but attributed incorrectly.

After finding the pamphlet (up top) from the 2002 Constructivist book cover exhibit at MoMA, I looked into whether an exhibition catalog had been published, and if so, was it still in print. It was, and it is:


The Russian Avant-Garde Book 1910-1934

Excerpt from the description: This richly illustrated catalogue accompanied the 2002 exhibition at The Museum of Modern Art of a major collection of Russian avant-garde books. Often hand-made and hand-printed in limited editions, these books were, in many instances, the result of collaborations between poets and painters. Among the well-known artists represented are Natalia Goncharova, El Lissitzky, and Aleksandr Rodchenko.


The book cover designs concentrate more so on the typography. This is what interests me. I have one book on this era in my home library, but it is focused on advertising posters, not book covers:


Soviet Commercial Design of the Twenties

Excerpt from the description: A richly illustrated account of one of the most original, influential and exciting aspects of post-Revolutionary art: commercial graphic design, during the short-lived period of Lenin’s New Economic Policy.



Wednesday
Jan312007

Free Peter & Sean



On Wednesday night, police in Boston arrested two artist/Massachusetts College of Art students Peter Berdovsky and Sean Stevens, and charged them with “placing a hoax device that resulted in panic”, a recently enacted Boston anti-terrorism law.

How did this happen?

Turner Broadcasting’s subsidiary, Cartoon Network hired guerrilla marketing firm, Interference Incorporated, to promote their young adult oriented evening cartoon Aqua Teen Hunger Force.

Interference Incorporated is the two man shop of Sam Travis Ewen, sam@interferenceinc.com and Michael Glickman, michael@interferenceinc.com of New York City, (212) 995-8553. Since news of the story broke, their website has been pulled offline.

Interference Inc. created a set of LED lit figures of one of the show’s characters, called “mooninites”. These small, battery operated signs like the one pictured above were magnetically backed as to be easily hung on most metal surfaces. Interference Inc. conceived of this campaign. Interference Inc. sold the campaign to Turner. Interference Inc. was responsible for getting the tchotchkes designed, arranging for their manufacture, hiring dozens of art school students (of which Peter and Sean are only two) in cities throughout the country to hang them, and arranging for the distribution of said items into the hands of said students in the following ten cities of Boston, New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta, Seattle, Portland, Ore., Austin, San Francisco, and Philadelphia.

Until today, the campaigns have been running in all 10 cities without incident for about two or three weeks. No other city besides Boston has made a complaint.

As a creative in the field of advertising myself, analyzing this campaign, it appears as though Interference Inc. actually went to great lengths to make sure the campaign didn’t break any graffiti or “post-no-bills” laws. Using magnets, it harmed no surfaces, and with its small size, it is probably not large enough to break laws barring billboards without permits. The choice of charging these sub-contracted, young local artists with a terrorist related offense over a promotion for a cartoon seems like a wild overreaction on the part of Massachusetts’ authorities. That’s just me.

To see images of the innocuous cartoon figure posted in context, go here and scroll left to right. They don’t look like dangerous devices. They look like a child’s Lite-Brite toy.

All of this is really beside the point. These guys were errand boys. They did not conceive of this campaign. They did not create these signs. They got paid by an agency in New York, Interference Inc., to go stick some magnets around Boston, who in turn were paid by Turner Broadcasting to promote a cartoon TV show. So the errand boys get charged.

Shirley Powell of Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. gave a statement taking responsibility, and apologizing to the city of Boston for creating an incident. I am not aware of any statement to have come from Turner regarding the fate of Peter Berdvosky and Sean Stevens. Shirley Powell can be contacted at shirley.powell@turner.com. If you feel Turner should take responsibility for their legal defense or, at the very least, give a statement in regard to their fate, please contact someone at Turner and diplomaticly voice this request.

If you believe that these young guys should not be held criminally responsible for actions they took on the part of an employer, please speak out to the media, and the state and city government in Boston, Massachusetts.

If you wish to respectfully voice your support for Peter Berdvosky and Sean Stevens, and request that the charges against them be reconsidered, you can contact Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, mass.gov@state.ma.us, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley, office@marthacoakley.com, and Mayor of Boston Thomas M. Menino, mayor@cityofboston.gov.

You can also share your opinions with these Boston media outlets:
CBS4 Boston 4
WHDH Boston 7
Boston.com
Boston Herald
90.9 NPR Boston Radio
WBZ 1030 Boston News Radio

Unbeknownst to Boston politicians, Attorney Generals, and Police Commissioners, through their actions, they have created more free publicity for this TV program than any amount of guerrilla marketing budget could expect to buy, more than Turner ever dreamed of.




Merchandizing Opportunities

On the exploitation front, You can already buy the t-shirt on Ebay… wait, breaking news, now you can even buy an actual Mooninites LED sign. Wait, that one has been removed, but this one, this one, and this one have now been listed.




Video of Peter & Sean as DJs, from 2005

While researching this story, some googling led me to a video file through a cached link to a webpage that had been removed. I was still able to download a video of Sean and Peter Dj-ing some music together at a Boston area DJ gathering. I have placed this video up on YouTube.





Finally some sanity

On May 11th, charges against Peter Berdovsky and Sean Stevens were dropped.